logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.12.07 2018고단931
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 21, 2018, the defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court for fraud, etc., and the same year.

2. 27. The judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant around December 14, 2016, at the D office operated by the defendant in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the defendant raised a large amount of profits from the victim E by purchasing coppers among non-ferrous metals and supplying them to F.

At this time, in order to remove the Korean power transformation station, our company will purchase and deliver 50,00 tons of Guriri, and our company entered into a removal contract in relation to the transfer of the air transport unit in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to Echeon-si.

If 100 million won is invested in our company, the profit of 15 million won will be paid along with the principal of the investment after one month.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant purchased old interest and did not supply it to F. The Defendant did not enter into a contract for the removal of the Korea Power Station and the removal of the public demand unit, and even if the Defendant received money from the damaged party, it did not guarantee that the Defendant would use old interest and make profits within a short period due to the lack of intent or ability to sell it, and would not guarantee that the Defendant would make profits high within a short period by using the investment money. The Defendant would have taken a method of paying 10-15% profits to the investors every month and redeeming the principal and profits to the existing investors with the investment money kept by the lower investors. Accordingly, as long as no new investor is continued to attract new investors, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay

The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) transferred KRW 100 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative account in the name of the Co., Ltd. on December 14, 2016; (c) returned KRW 100 million to the victim around January 13, 2017; and (d) received KRW 100 million from the victim as investment money again from the victim.

arrow