logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2017.08.22 2017고정161
강요등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was the head of the chapter D, an incorporated association (hereinafter referred to as “D”) located on the second floor of the C Building, and E is the head of the D Secretariat, and F is the person who served as the head of the D Secretariat, and the deaf interpreter.

1. Forced [Resumed Facts] F employed an external instructor at the D office around March 2015, and sought a business plan that received part of the lecture fees as principal and used as operating funds, and reported in sequence to E and the Defendant as a superior, and E and the Defendant approved this.

The Defendant, E, and F employed the Victim G as an external instructor according to the above project plan and stated that 30% out of the tuition fees should be donated to the victim as principal in order for the victim to work as an external instructor. From December 14, 2015 to December 14, 2015, the Defendant and E, and E were paid KRW 2.4 million in total as the D support payment account (CF, Account Number H).

[] The victim of the crime committed the crime, as above, was unable to pay support money any more due to economic difficulties while paying part of the tuition fees received from D as principal, and it was difficult to pay support money to F around March 2016 due to financial difficulties. It is difficult to pay support money to F around March 2016, because there is a lot of money entering the house due to a person with a disability, who is the husband, and secondly, he is difficult to pay support money because there

“The absolute support payments may not be paid to E”.

“.” The F and E reported the above intent of the victim to the Defendant.

Although the Defendant received a report from E on the intent of refusing to pay the victim’s support payment, the Defendant instructed E to “not to dismiss the victim, but to have the victim continue to donate the support payment,” and the E and F demanded the victim to continue to donate the support payment according to the Defendant’s direction.

Accordingly, the victim, who caused the fear that it may be dismissed in D if the support payment is not made continuously, is 30,000 won at the account of D around April 21, 2016.

arrow