The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (6 months of imprisonment) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment appears to have led to the confession of the crime of this case and against his mistake, and the fact that it seems that the injured person was not serious at the time of the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant. However, the crime of this case is not good, and the defendant's blood alcohol concentration at the time of this case was considerably high by 0.260% since the defendant's blood alcohol level at the time of the crime of this case was the escape after causing traffic accident by shocking the damaged vehicle while driving under drinking or unlicensed conditions, and the defendant did not agree with the victim, etc., they exceeded the reasonable limits of discretion of sentencing determination, unlike other factors unfavorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the situation before and after the crime of this case, and the scope of sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court sentencing committee, and others

In full view of the circumstances to be assessed or the fact that there is no newly discovered data in the course of a trial of sentencing on the political party (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015, etc.), etc., the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable because the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.