1. The Defendant’s executory exemplification of the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2017Da59582 Decided May 11, 2018.

In full view of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 9, and 10 as well as the overall purport of the pleadings, the facts that each item listed in the separate sheet is owned by the plaintiff, not C, can be acknowledged. Therefore, a compulsory execution by the defendant against each item listed in the separate sheet, based on the executive title of C, shall be

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by applying the main text of Article 48 (3) and Article 47 (1) and (2) of the Civil Execution Act to the approval of provisional disposition and provisional execution, and Article 98 of the Civil Procedure Act to the burden of litigation costs.