The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실오인 및 법리오해 이 사건 범행 장소는 강남역 주변으로 사람들의 통행이 매우 빈번하고 번잡한 곳이고 범행 당시는 점심시간으로 사람들이 더욱 붐볐을 것으로 예상되므로 이 사건이 실외에서 발생하였다고 하더라고 실내에서 발생한 유사 사안과 달리 볼 것이 아니고, 이 사건 당시 피고인 옆에 있던 종이 박스에 불이 붙어 이미 공공의 위험성이 발생하였으므로 피고인이 이 사건 당시 휴대하고 있던 1회용 라이터는 형법 제144조의 ‘위험한 물건’에 해당함에도, 이와 달리 위험한 물건에 해당하지 않는다고 판단한 원심판결에는 사실을 오인하거나 법리를 오해하여 판결에 영향을 미친 위법이 있다.

B. The sentence of a fine of one million won imposed by the court below on the defendant is too uneasible and unfair.

2. We examine ex officio the grounds for appeal prior to the judgment ex officio.

According to the records, the defendant stated his residence as "Seoul Gangnam-gu E201" in the police investigation, and the court of the court of the original instance recognized the fact that the defendant made a judgment by serving a public trial in the absence of the defendant, without taking measures such as serving documents on the above address or entrusting the investigation of the location, and without serving documents on the defendant by serving public notice.

According to the above facts of recognition, the court below did not take necessary measures to confirm the whereabouts of the defendant and rendered a judgment by service by public notice and without the defendant's statement. Thus, the court below's judgment cannot be maintained as it did not err in the misapprehension of Acts and subordinate statutes, which affected the judgment.

However, the prosecutor's assertion of misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles is still subject to the judgment of the court.

3. The prosecutor's mistake, misunderstanding of legal principles.