1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, and D were 2012 school motives that were admitted to the E management graduate school EMA process, and Defendant B and Defendant C were married.

On June 14, 2013, Defendant C filed a lawsuit seeking divorce, compensation for damages, etc. (hereinafter “instant divorce lawsuit”) against Plaintiff and Defendant B on the ground that Defendant B is going beyond the Plaintiff, etc., and on July 29, 2013, Defendant C filed a lawsuit claiming damages (hereinafter “instant lawsuit”) against Plaintiff and Defendant B on the ground that Defendant B is not the other party who was not the Plaintiff. On August 28, 2013, Defendant C withdrawn the part of the instant divorce lawsuit against Plaintiff on August 28, 2013.

On November 25, 2013, the instant divorce lawsuit was concluded and terminated after the conciliation was concluded that “Defendant B paid 80,000,000 won to Defendant C as consolation money and division of property, and Defendant C received 50,000,000 won from Defendant B, and at the same time withdrawn the criminal complaint against Defendant B, and given up all civil and criminal claims against D,” and Defendant C withdrawn the instant lawsuit on December 6, 2013 according to the terms agreed upon in the said conciliation.

B. Defendant B: (a) resisting that the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s mother were the co-defendants of the instant divorce lawsuit; (b) obstructed text messages or telephone calls, etc. to the effect that the part against the Plaintiff was withdrawn even after the revocation of the part against the Plaintiff; (c) on October 1, 2013, the Plaintiff and F applied for a provisional injunction against access against the Plaintiff and F (U.S. District Court 2013Kahap406); and (d) on October 18, 2013, the Plaintiff and F were not allowed to access the Defendant B within 100 meters from the Defendant’s will or make any speech related to the Defendant B to a third party; and (d) from the date of the instant provisional injunction decision, the Plaintiff or F made a mobile phone in the Defendant’s name via the Plaintiff or a third party, or left or left a voice message.