1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The grounds for appeal by the Defendants cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations by the court of first instance, and each evidence submitted by the court of first instance is deemed legitimate even if each evidence submitted by the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the court's reasoning for this case is as follows: (a) the first instance court's second instance court's second instance judgment's "satisfy.........." under the second instance court's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's "satisfy" (hereinafter "the accident in this case"); (b) the first instance court's "E" among workers in the fourth and second instance "E," and (c) the third instance's "............", the defendant's rules of employment set the retirement age of members by the age of 65 years, and the plaintiff's maximum working age should also be 0.0 years, and Article 71 (1) of the E Rules of Employment set the retirement age of members as the last day of the month when 65 years old, and Article 70 (2) of the E Rules of Employment provides that "the plaintiff's second instance court's retirement age cannot be viewed as the plaintiff's employment contract's 1-A's employment age under the above provision.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified in conclusion, and thus, the defendants' appeal is justified.