beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
“Around January 27, 2015, the Defendant 2017 Highest 39”, from “D,” located in Ischeon-si, E, to the victim E, “I will use money for three months.”
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, around that time, the Defendant was unable to repay the debts of financial institutions, such as Samsung Card Co., Ltd., and trust assets lending, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay even if he borrowed money from the damaged party due to no particular income.
Nevertheless, on January 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) transferred KRW 4 million to the Nonghyup Bank account in the name of the Defendant on April 2, 2015; (c) KRW 3 million on April 2, 2015; and (d) KRW 10 million on April 14, 2015.
"2017 Highest 1028"
1. On January 21, 2016, the Defendant against the Victim F was running by the Defendant in Pyeongtaek-si G, which was running by the Defendant, from “H multilateral bank”, the Defendant loaned KRW 30 million to the Victim F, thereby coming to KRW 60 million in the amount of deposit deposit KRW 60 million in Echeon-si I. The Defendant paid out as the deposit proceeds.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not receive a monthly or annual refund, and there was no intention or ability to pay the deposit even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party for the reason that the Daca and Kaca et al. operated around that time did not have any special income and the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party for about KRW 40 million because it did not have any obligation.
As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received delivery of KRW 27 million from the victim; (c) KRW 27 million around February 18, 2016; (d) KRW 10 million around February 29, 2016; and (e) KRW 2.5 million around March 20, 2016.
2. On February 29, 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim J would repay the money 10,000 won to the victim J by telephone at the same place as Paragraph 1 of the same Article, and by telephone to the victim J after 10,000 won.
“A false representation was made.”
However, the defendant is guilty.