Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of (State)G in Daegu-gu, and Defendant B is the internal director of the said company.

1. On January 10, 2015, the Defendants related to “Dog L&C” frauds would develop a smartphone display application with the victim H and I, “The Defendant would develop a smartphone display application with which she may receive letters from us if it makes an investment in us.”

11 won per letter may be collected for a fee.

Defendant B made a false representation, and Defendant B made it possible to bring profits from mms generated by the implementation of the instant case to the said victims.

When investing in us, it is expected to develop an application and raise a large amount of revenue.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, even if the Defendants received the investment money from the victims, they did not have the intent and ability to make a fluent case or pay the proceeds. In fact, the Defendants did not use the investment money at all for the development of the Dob L&C term, and used it for personal purposes.

On January 10, 2015, the Defendants deceptioned the victims and received KRW 10,800,000 from the victims to the Defendant’s account on January 10, 2015, and received KRW 59,670,000 in total under the name of the mobile phone purchase necessary for the Defendant’s project fund and the project, such as the previous list of crimes (1).

As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce victims, thereby deceiving 59,670,000 won from the victims.

2. The Defendants, in relation to the right to operate the Gannam Branch, wanting to give victims the right to operate the Gannam Branch, although the Defendants did not have the right to obtain the right to operate the Gannam Branch.

The intention was to acquire down payment, etc. by fraud.

Accordingly, the defendant A, at the office of the above company around March 2015, ordered the victims "BJ company's total right to remain in Yong-Nam," and ordered the down payment to us.