logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.06.21 2019고정334
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person driving a B-ro vehicle.

On December 15, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:20 on December 15, 2018, and proceeded the front paths in Daegu Suwon-gu C from E to the water negative distance.

A person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering side and the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not properly go through the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as knee, knee, and knee, in which treatment is required for about three weeks due to the above occupational negligence, and knee, in detail, damaged KRW 3,454,540 of the market price, such as the cost of repairing the car in the halog-gu car.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act;

(b) A crime of non-violation of will: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Traffic Accident Settlement

C. After the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his intention not to punish the defendant.

Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow