beta
Text
The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 20,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from June 12, 2020 to November 4, 2020, and thereafter.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On March 24, 1994, the Plaintiff has three full-time children, who are the legal couple having reported marriage with C on March 24, 1994.
B. Around October 2014, the Defendant became aware of C, which was a son of a high school where children were enrolled between the Defendant and D, and had been aware of C’s marriage, and maintained an unlawful relationship, such as going to travel with C, or giving and receiving inappropriate contact with mobile phone messages from around that time to November 2020, and having sexual intercourse.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements and images, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on this safety defense
A. As to the plaintiff's main defense against the defendant, the defendant sought compensation for damages caused by the plaintiff's unlawful act with C, the defendant's domicile is known to the defendant, and the plaintiff also resided in the actual neck and changed his domicile to Incheon for the purpose of acquiring a new trial for the filing of the lawsuit in this case. Thus, this court does not have jurisdiction over this court. ② The plaintiff found the defendant and D around January 2020 and agreed not to hold the defendant liable for the defendant in relation to the lawsuit in this case. Thus, the lawsuit in this case is unlawful as it violates the non-committee agreement, and thus, the plaintiff asserted that it is unlawful.
B. First of all, as to the defense of violation of jurisdiction, a lawsuit on property rights may be brought to the court having jurisdiction over the place of residence or the place of obligation. Thus, in this case where the Plaintiff seeks monetary payment against the Defendant, the court having jurisdiction over the seat of the Plaintiff’s domicile has jurisdiction over the place of obligation performance as the court having jurisdiction over the
According to Gap evidence No. 9, the plaintiff completed the move-in report for the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E and F, which is the present domicile of the plaintiff and his children, on December 13, 2019. Thus, this court has the jurisdiction over the lawsuit of this case, and the plaintiff has the move-in report.