logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.20 2012가합522419 (1)
사용료
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”)

(C) On December 14, 2010, the construction of a new project facility (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction”) at the time of resident stay ordered by the Gyeongbuk-do Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction”).

(2) A contract was concluded on March 21, 201 with the construction cost of KRW 675,00,00 (including value-added tax, KRW 742,50,000), and the construction period of KRW 5,363,473,00, and the construction period of KRW 20 from December 22, 201 to June 29, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “the construction of the instant subcontract”). The Defendant corporation entered into a contract with the subcontractor by setting the terms of subcontracting from March 21, 201 to December 30, 201, for the temporary construction, reinforced concrete construction, and waterproof construction (hereinafter referred to as “the instant subcontract construction”) among the instant construction works.

B. As of August 31, 201, the Plaintiff operated a personal business entity with the trade name “J” at the time of the instant subcontracting work. From March 19, 2011, the Plaintiff sent 50 mars to the site of this case to the site agent at the site of this case, and supplied marbs 500 to the site of this case in the name of F on March 19, 2011, and caused E to take over mars. (2) Defendant Gold Construction entered the temporary materials at the site of this case as indicated in the attached Table 2 flow. (3) on March 31, 2011, in relation to the instant subcontracted work, the Plaintiff paid marbs 66,00,000,000 won as the mold price, marbs 222,00,000 won as the purchase price for steel products with the trade name “G”, and marbs 600,000.

3) 360 water pumps (60x1200), 120 water pumps (450x1200), and 540 water pumps (60x1200) entered on March 29, 201, which the Plaintiff entered into the construction site of this case on March 27, 2011, all of the water pumps (600x1200) entered into the construction site of this case on March 29, 201 (hereinafter referred to as “development water pumps”).

leased and entered from them;

arrow