1. The plaintiff's primary claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s Cho Dong-dong purchased a F 139m2 from Dong-gun, Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun, and also purchased the instant land.

B. Since January 6, 1981, the Plaintiff’s father G occupied the F land and the instant land by constructing a new house on the ground of the instant land for twenty (20) years as its owner’s intention, and the Plaintiff continues to occupy it after inheritance from the deceased G.

C. Therefore, the Defendant is liable to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on January 6, 2001 with respect to the instant land to the Plaintiff.

Preliminaryly, the Defendant drafted a written agreement to acknowledge that the Plaintiff’s mother’s ownership of the instant land was against H, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to confirm that the Plaintiff was the management right of the instant land.

2. The Plaintiff purchased the land in this case from the deceased T, with the result of the fact-finding on the Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad 11 (including the paper numbers) and the fact-finding on this court.

B. On January 6, 1981, the Plaintiff’s father G installed a fence and gate on the ground of the instant land and occupied them for 20 years from that time.

In addition, according to the statements in the evidence No. 1 through No. 3, the Defendant recognized that the management ownership of the instant land was against the Plaintiff’s mother, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise, the instant land was owned by the Defendant and sold to the Defendant under the unregistered condition around October 1987 via I, J, K, and L. Since then, the Defendant occupied the instant land, and thereafter filed a lawsuit against the deceased E for the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of the completion of the acquisition by prescription as of April 30, 1980 for the purpose of completing the registration of transfer of ownership, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the deceased E’s heir on the ground of the completion of the acquisition by prescription as of April 1, 196.