logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고단4071
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving Category C Masing vehicles in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

On November 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.229% during blood transfusion around 01:17, and led to two lanes in front of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, one of the three lanes in front of Mapo-gu, to the direction of the middle intersection in the direction of the middle intersection.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving duties has a duty of care to reduce speed and safely proceed according to traffic conditions by accurately operating the steering and brake system before, after, after, after and after the driving of a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive normally due to influence of drinking, such as locking out and black red colors, and due to negligence, caused by the Defendant’s failure to drive the vehicle, and received the part behind the Defendant’s vehicle back to the front part of the victim E (37 years old) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As above, Defendant E suffered bodily injury, such as “hume dynasium and tension,” which requires approximately two weeks’ medical care due to occupational negligence, in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking.

2. While the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.229% during the day-to-day alcohol as described in paragraph (1), he/she driven a Damp vehicle from the Non-Road in Seongbuk-gu Seoul to the front road in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a traffic accident report, a survey report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, a report on the detection of a driver at the main place (based on the verification of details of damage);

1. Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the act of causing bodily injury to the driving of danger) and the Road Traffic Act.

arrow