logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.06.07 2011고합732
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(배임)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Defendant

B shall be innocent.

Reasons

Ⅰ. Defendant A was in charge of the management and sale of used facilities used in the manufacture of semiconductors while serving as the vice head of the purchasing team of the semiconductor project team of the Young-gu T&S T&S, Young-si.

Defendant

B around December 3, 2009, for the purpose of manufacturing and distributing semiconductors and L CD facilities, U.S. 203, the representative director of the corporation V, a corporation established around December 3, 2009, and the Defendant’s wife W is in substance operating the X, a corporation that is in charge of the representative director. From around 1996, Defendant A and Defendant A came to be aware of the external instructors and educational personnel of the computer in a semiconductor business establishment, and performed the construction of T semiconductor equipment logistics storage management system (ERM) around 2007, and around 2008, Defendant A and B performed the service of opening a sales website (Y, Y, Y, Y) for the second equipment auction (Y, Y) of T order.

The semiconductor industry has been engaged in a large number of manufacturing processes through which raw materials (wafers, Wafer) are able to manufacture products, and all such processes are equipped with the same process, and the existing equipment has been continuously replaced with new equipment for technological development and the maintenance of competitiveness. Since the demand of the technology-oriented manufacturer or the used by the semiconductor technology-leading company for the purchase of the used used equipment such as T, heavy equipment has been traded at KRW KRW 00 million per unit of the equipment, T has been divided into Grade 4 in consideration of the condition of the wear of the new equipment and the replacement of the equipment, and the Defendant A, who has been in charge of the management and sale of the semiconductor equipment used for semiconductor manufacturing, has been in charge of the management and sale of the equipment used for semiconductor manufacturing, as seen above, so that the equipment subject to disuse does not cause any loss or damage to T in managing and selling the equipment.

arrow