logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.05.19 2014고단413
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 5, 2014, at around 02:20, the Defendant was boarding a taxi driven by C in front of the Korea Broadcasting and Communications University that opened the Silju-gu Opendong, and arrived at the 5-day road in front of the Silung-gu, Seodong-gu, the destination of which was the 93 sexual scamblance apartment complex, but without getting off the taxi in front of the 5-day residential complex, the Defendant scam in the said taxi.

Accordingly, C reported 112, and C demanded the Defendant to leave the taxi by the slope E and slope F belonging to the Cheongju Police Station D District D District D District D District E and the dispatched after receiving the report, the Defendant left the taxi but urged the Defendant to return to the taxi by paying the taxi fee, and without complying with it.

Accordingly, in order to ask the defendant's personal information, the defendant, the defendant, a slope E, etc., sounded that "Chos, the police sees, sees, sees, and sees," and assaulted the chest part of the breast part of the slope E in his hand by hand, with his hand, by cutting down the sloping E and slopeF.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written statements and written statements of E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a crime of assaulting police officers, such as breathing two police officers performing their duties in a lawful manner, and the nature of the crime is heavy.

However, considering the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant reflects the defendant's wrong, there is no same criminal record, and there is no criminal record other than the fine once every 20 years, and the defendant's age, character, conduct, occupation, family relationship and financial status conditions are equally considered.

arrow