The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of execution of two years, the community service work 120 hours, and the lecture attendance order 40 hours) that the court below sentenced is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the facts charged of this case, the defendant suffered from chronic virus C confection, reproductive disorder, etc., and the defendant agreed with the victim, etc. However, the crime of this case is deemed to be very poor in light of the method of crime, etc., and the defendant's health status is to the extent that it is difficult to provide community service.

In light of the following facts: (a) there is no possibility to see that the Defendant has been subject to criminal punishment on several occasions, such as a single sentence, a stay of execution, etc.; (b) there is no special change in circumstances that could change the sentence of the lower court after the lower court was sentenced; and (c) other various conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.