The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable that the sentence (one million won in penalty) pronounced by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the Defendant did not have any particular criminal record are favorable circumstances.

However, the defendant is not only in the court below but also in the appellate court, and it is disadvantageous to the defendant that he did not seriously reflect his wrongness and that he did not agree with the victim.

In full view of other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances after committing a crime, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.