The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Circumstances favorable to the defendant are as follows.

The defendant is divided into each of the crimes in this case and is against himself.

The amount that the defendant stolen is the small amount.

Circumstances unfavorable to the defendant are as follows:

After the defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor due to special larceny in 2011, he committed each of the crimes in this case during the period of repeated crime.

In 2004, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of two years and six months.

The defendant did not take measures to recover damage and the injured person was punished for the defendant.

There is no change in circumstances that may change the sentence of the court below when the above circumstances were different from the above circumstances, and considering the defendant's age, sex, career, environment, circumstances and result of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions stated in the record and the changed theory, such as the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.