The defendant's KRW 41,961,920 to the plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from September 1, 2018 to January 13, 2021.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a corporation that was entrusted with the industrial accident compensation insurance business by the Minister of Labor pursuant to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and the Defendant is an insurance company that concluded a sales liability insurance contract with C25 tons of tea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”).

B Around 13:40 on August 10, 2017, D was engaged in the work of arbiter H (hereinafter “victim”)’s work, who was a worker of G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) at the E F’s workplace located in the G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) in accordance with the new name of the son H (hereinafter “victim”), and the Plaintiff paid 60 won for the instant accident, 2,3,44, 5, 76, 75, 76, 75, 76, 76, 75, 76, 7, 76, 76, 60, 76, 76, 75, 60, 75, 60, 60, 60, 60, 60, 60, 60, 60, 60, 60, 60, 60, 7, 5, and 5, etc., of this case.

[Ground of recognition] In light of the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5 through 10, 12, 13, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 6, witness H's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings, and the occurrence of the defendant's liability for damages and the occurrence of limited liability for damages, the accident of this case was caused by DNA's mistake, which did not properly examine the victim's number signal when working inside the container.

As such, the defendant A is the insurer of business liability for the fore-owned vehicles in this case, and is liable to compensate the victim for the loss incurred by the victim due to the accident in this case.