logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.10.05 2016고단574
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 21, 2014, the Defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that “In order to open a new mobile phone, the Defendant shall first settle the unpaid charges on the existing mobile phone in order to open a new mobile phone,” and that it would only be possible for another agency to open two cell phones to transfer the mobile phone to him/her. The Defendant did not look at all the responsibility for the device installment payments, communications charges, etc. incurred for the newly opened mobile phone two mobile phone units.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to distribute a new cell phone received from the victim and a core chip annexed thereto, and there was no intention or ability to pay the value of the device and the telecommunications fee.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in the G stores located in the Chang-si Mucompo-gu F, had the victim take a new gallon, and the gallonian 31 unit in the name of the victim, received it, and then separately disposed of the mobile phone and the gallon chip to dispose of the mobile phone and the gallon chip, thereby causing a total amount of KRW 2,419,320 to the victim.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, obtained pecuniary gains equivalent to the same amount of money.

2. The Defendant against the victim H, I, and J came to know of the victim H by K while working as an employee of the mobile phone sales store. After that, the victim H introduced the victim I, and the victim I became aware of the victim H, I, and J by introducing the victim J.

On May 26, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim H, I, and J did not pay one percentage if he/she appointed an attorney-at-law and applied for individual rehabilitation to the victim H even if he/she received a loan from a credit company.

In this regard, the author first examines the lawyer's fee from the money loaned to the public who is responsible for the appointment of the lawyer and the personal rehabilitation.

arrow