1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the Plaintiff, which either orders performance or orders payment under the following conditions.

Basic Facts

The court's explanation on this part is citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is the same as the reasoning of the judgment

The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the claim for a corrective report is without truth for the following reasons, and the Defendant is obligated to make a corrective report on the ground that the content reported by the Defendant through the instant accident was damaged by the Plaintiff’s honor.

The plaintiff is found to issue 10,000 copies per day on the basis of the documents submitted by D.

Therefore, the content of the instant accident is different from the fact that D issued 6,000 copies per day in 2013 and 2014.

Even if D issued 6,00 copies a day, the Plaintiff could not have known such facts. Therefore, the instant accident that the Plaintiff conspired with D to manipulate the number of copies issued is also different from the fact.

A corporation I (Representative Director J) published a daily newspaper under the title of "E" and went bankrupt in 2012. However, the corporation E (Representative Director K) acquired trademark rights and all other rights related to subparagraph E, thereby completing registration procedures under the Act on the Promotion of Newspapers, Etc. on September 24, 2013.

Since then, E, a stock company, published daily newspapers using the title of “E”, the title of “E” continued to be maintained without any closed entry.

Therefore, it has the contents of the Gu E that was closed even if there was no absence in the year 2014.

The publication was made with attachment.

The accident of this case is different from the fact.

Judgment

A victim who requests a corrective report concerning the content of a press report, etc. on the premise of determination as to a claim for a corrective report shall bear the burden of proving that the press report, etc. is not true.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2009Da52649 Decided September 2, 201, etc.).