The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). It is recognized that the Defendant led to confession and reflect by the Defendant, partial damage was recovered, and that some damage was accepted by some victims.

However, in full view of the various circumstances revealed in the records and arguments, including the fact that the defendant has a history of fraud at multiple times, the crime of this case was committed during the suspension period of the execution of imprisonment due to fraud, and most damages were not recovered, the punishment sentenced by the court below is not heavy.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.