logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.03.16 2016가합8901
동산 인도 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who has maintained a de facto marital relationship from around 2010 to March 25, 2016, and the Defendant is a child E.

Party A agree to reimburse the expenses incurred in raising Korea-style cattle invested by Party B for a remote future for Party E, the agreement for the implementation of the agreement, (A) E, the Plaintiff’s agreement, and Party B, the agreement, as follows:

C. Foods

1. On March 14, 201, Party A and Party B agreed to marry without filing a marriage report, and two people began to enter into a marriage by combining themselves.

2. Eul shall own five tons G trucks in the name of Eul, and one ton H Pool vehicles, etc., of five tons of G trucks in the name of Eul, and one ton of all movable assets in the name of Eul, such as feed, etc., at least 136 U.S. invested by Eul prior to marriage.

Provided, That only when A and B maintain their marriage life, the above matters shall be implemented, and where a divorce is made, it shall be divided by 1/2 for paragraph (2).

3.If there is an increase or decrease in the number of days later than 136, one shall take over the said one as at the present time, but all such one shall belong to B, regardless of the owner named in the Livestock Cooperatives.

4. If A dies, B may not raise an objection to the real estate, the transfer of which has already been made to B’s children.

5. Gap and Eul shall prepare a memorandum of performance of the above agreement and shall be notarized to confirm it.

On July 7, 2014, the above agreement, Gap E (a) was signed and sealed by the plaintiff (a seal)

B. On July 7, 2014, the Plaintiff and E drafted a letter of agreed implementation (hereinafter “each of the instant notes”) with the following content.

C. E died on April 19, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. In accordance with the Plaintiff’s assertion’s written statement of this case, the Plaintiff and E agree with the Plaintiff as the owner of Korea-Japan (hereinafter “Korea-Japan”) in Ansan-si C.

arrow