A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 9, 2018, the Defendant, at the dwelling space located in Gyeonggi-do, 09:30 on July 9, 2018, said dwelling space is about D, his wife, the attendance of his children, and the child home of his children.

D. D. D. D. D. “I.D., ex officio, and upon its death.”

“A sounder,” and this shall have occurred.

The defendant thrown away a knife, which is a dangerous thing in the State of Washington, with approximately 30 cm in length, from the part of the victim E (3 cm in length), who is his own child.

“The victim was threatened by carrying dangerous objects.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A report on investigation (on-site investigation conducted by a police officer called for the first time);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the results of investigation (limited to criminal tools and photographs of victims);

1. As to the facts of the crime, Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the applicable criminal facts, Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment, the Defendant, at the time of the instant crime, has left hand as a knife and knife the head of the victim with his/her knife and knife his/

The Defendant got a sound, and the Defendant’s wife reported to the police with his cell phone, and made an assault, such as cutting off his cell phone, cutting away his/her cell phone, and cutting off his/her DNA trees.

In addition, on October 26, 2016, the defendant was investigated by an investigative agency on a criminal fact that he/she had a flabeded victim (six months after he/she was born) who had a flabed dispute with her wife D, led him/her to his/her flab and was on the floor and the floor, and was sent to this court as a home protection case, and was investigated by the investigative agency several times due to the criminal fact that he/she had assaulted her her wife D.

Although the defendant has a duty to protect and rear the frighter as the father's interest guardian of the victim, the defendant is rather about the life and body of the victim.