beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 10,697,306 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from December 23, 2015 to April 21, 2016.
Reasons
1. The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall be deemed to be filed together with the facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is the party’s position 1) Credit Card Information and Communications Network Business (hereinafter “N-value Dogwork”) business (hereinafter “N-value Dogwork,” and if a credit card merchant transmits data such as card numbers to a business electronic data processing device by means of a device, the Information and Communications Department Business Company refers to the service that the credit card merchant sent the above information to the credit card company and notified the franchise store of the result of the approval after receiving the results of the transmission.
[2] A company that has concluded an agency contract with the company that runs the business of soliciting and managing credit card member stores on behalf of the plaintiff while entering into an agency contract with the plaintiff, and directly entering into an agency contract with the other company for the purpose of managing and managing the member store in the position of the so-called "total group" in which the affairs of soliciting and managing credit card member stores are delegated from the company that performs the business of soliciting and managing credit card member stores. (2) The defendant is in the position of recruiting and managing credit card member stores on behalf of the plaintiff while entering into an agency contract with the plaintiff and operating the "B" in the trade name of "B", and the Han Stoto Ri Co., Ltd (hereinafter "Korea Stoto Ri") is a company that has recruited and managed credit card member stores by proxy
B. (1) On July 6, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an agency contract with the Defendant on behalf of managing and operating the credit card member stores offered by the Defendant and the service provider (hereinafter “instant agency contract”).
(2) On October 4, 2010, the Defendant entered into an agency transfer contract with the Plaintiff, which is subject to the transfer of agency contract with the Plaintiff, in the presence of the Plaintiff, and determined the subject of the transfer as follows.
Article 2 (Subject Matter of Interest)
1. Hansto Ri.