logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원당진시법원 2015.08.26 2015가단17
청구이의
Text

1. On the original copy of the payment order issued by the Defendant, the Daejeon District Court of the Daejeon District Court of the Daejeon District Court of the Republic of Korea, 2015.

Reasons

1. The fact that the defendant, on June 11, 2014, filed an application with this court for a payment order of credit card use price claim against B under the 2014th and 614, and the payment order was served on June 19, 2014 and became final and conclusive on July 3, 2014. After that, the plaintiff, who is his/her father, died on July 13, 2014, filed an application for a qualified acceptance of inheritance with Seosan branch of the Daejeon Family Court for the inheritance approval, and the above court accepted the declaration of qualified acceptance that limits inherited property to the attached list on August 21, 2014. On the other hand, the defendant received the inheritance of the execution clause from this court on February 23, 2015.

2. Inasmuch as the Plaintiff’s active property exists after having been tried to grant a limited approval for inheritance, as seen above, the Plaintiff is obligated to repay obligations based on the payment order (No. 2014) No. 614 of this Court within the scope of the property inherited from B.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable within this scope, and the costs of lawsuit are reasonable to be borne by each party, so it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow