logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2020.05.08 2019고단2357
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On November 10, 2017, A was sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of fraud using computers, etc. by the Daegu District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on April 4, 2018.

Defendant

B On February 9, 2017, in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, sentenced four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") and the parole period was expired on February 28, 2018 during the execution of the sentence, and the parole period was expired on April 10, 2018.

[2019 order 2357] The Defendants’ name misscam fraud assistance staff led and led many and unspecified persons to commit the so-called “loan ice-phishing fraud” by telephone, and Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant B and co-offender C conspired to play a role in receiving money transferred from the victims of loan fraud to the accounts designated by the aforementioned holders of the above name misscam.

On October 28, 2019, the employee of the LAC 11:03 called to the victim D at a non-place on the name of October 28, 2019, and falsely called “E’s existing loans of KRW 13,900,000 may be paid to the FF bank low interest rate of KRW 40,000,00 only at present.” Thus, the employee of the LAC 13,90,000 was certified by installing a display in smartphone, and obtained the certification, and then directly delivered the existing loans to the FF bank employees.”

However, in fact, the person who was not a member of the F Bank was not a member of the F Bank as a member of the Bophishing fraud, due to the above smartphone display application, the victim was installing a malicious program to make the victim take the phone when the telephone was made. Even if the victim received money from the victim, the existing loan was not repaid, or there was no intention or ability to provide a low interest loan.

Nevertheless, the name-based person, as above, should withdraw 13,900,000 won in cash for the repayment of existing loans by deceiving the victim as above, and deliver it to the accomplice C who misrepresented the F Bank Claim Team staff.

arrow