The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Even if a defendant's defense counsel received a notice of receipt of the records of trial at the lower court on November 1, 2017 and on November 21, 2017, before the lapse of 20 days from the day following the day on which he/she received the notice of receipt of the records of trial, the defendant submitted a written reason for appeal on January 17, 2017, and the national defense counsel made a statement of unfair appeal on the grounds of sentencing at the trial date, and on December 1, 2017, after the lapse of the period for each appeal, the defendant and the national defense counsel deprived him/her of the opportunity to submit a written reason for appeal by the reason for appeal.

Nor can it (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Do10706, Aug. 17, 2012). Moreover, the issue of whether to postpone or postpone the date for the closing or closing of pleadings or the closed pleadings falls under the discretion of the court, and the record reveals that the court below, upon examining the record, rendered a judgment without accepting the application for postponement of the date for declaration for agreement, etc. with the victim

On the other hand, there is a violation of procedural law by infringing on the defendant's right to defense or restricting the right to assistance of a private legal counsel.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.