1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3.Paragraph 1 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 20, 2014, the Plaintiff suspended the operation of C vehicle (4.5 tons of freezing truck) and requested the repair of the engine by suffering the said vehicle from D (hereinafter “Defendant Upgrade”) operated by the Defendant. At the time, the Defendant was performing artificial projector repair, fluor double, meral plant processing, and fluor processing.

B. Upon the Defendant’s repair of the engine, the Plaintiff sent the said vehicle out of KRW 5.3 million to the E upper conference that supplied parts on March 25, 2014, after settling the payment of KRW 5.3 million, KRW 3,465,00 in total, and KRW 8,765,00 in repair costs.

C. On April 25, 2014, the Plaintiff exchanged the engine work with Gwangju F, but the symptoms were found as long as the engine work takes place, and the Plaintiff maintained the vehicle by suffering the said vehicle from the Defendant’s office on May 27, 2014.

On June 11, 2014, the Plaintiff exchanged the engine work with Gwangju F, but there was symptoms as long as the engine work results again, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle was judged to be in the operation failure in Gwangju G on July 24, 2014, and on July 25, 2014, the Plaintiff exchanged the brine seeds and engine errors by putting the vehicle into the Defendant’s repair shop.

E. On August 8, 2014, the Plaintiff’s vehicle suspended engines in the vicinity of the New ICT during the operation of the Highway, and was unable to operate the engine. The Plaintiff’s vehicle entered the said vehicle as H and repaired the engine again. At the time, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was damaged by the cell block, the cream axis, the 4th ton, the string, the detoning, the offline, the offline pumps, and the racker. At the same time, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was stored inside the engine panpanty floor, and the Engine was scattered from the outside of the engine.

F. Meanwhile, the cause of the suspension of the engine in the instant case was that the engine was suspended as the luston and luston surface was flicked into a lusculous part, and the lusculing generated by the lusculous and lusculer’s surface was flicked into a lusculing part, and the lusculing was caused.

G. The daily rent for the Plaintiff’s vehicle is KRW 114,790.