logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.02.14 2018고단2395
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a car B.

On August 6, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol level of 0.123% 0.123%, while under the influence of alcohol around 10:35 on August 6, 2018, and proceeded at the point of 24.4km down from the Seoul Southern Metropolitan Highway, Gangdong-gu, at a speed that would not be known depending on one lane among the five-lanes.

At the time, there was a different vehicle in operation on the front and right side of the defendant, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to observe the safety distance with the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle, thoroughly show the front and rear left of the course, and to operate the vehicle accurately and safely, thereby preventing the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant neglected this and neglected to drive a car at a normal time due to the influence of drinking, the part of the front part of the car driven by the Defendant at the front part of the car driven by the Defendant, which was driven by the victim C(E, the South and fifty-two years old) who was driving at the front section of the car driven by the Defendant, received the rear part of the car driven by the victim E (E, the 53 years old) who was driving by the Defendant while trying to change the vehicle at a two-lane line in order to deal with the said accident, he received the front part of the car driven by the victim E (E, the 53 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury to the victim C, who is the driver of the driver of the vehicle frighting in the above occupational negligence, and the victim G (V, 49 years of age), the victim H (V, 15 years of age), and the victim I (V, 17 years of age), such as salt, tension, etc. in each of about five days of treatment, and the victim E and E, who is the driver of the vehicle frighting in the above mountain, and the victim K (V, 14 years of age), and the victim K (V, 11 years of age), respectively, by causing about two weeks of treatment.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act;

arrow