beta
Text
Defendant
B Imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months, Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 1 million won.
Defendant
A does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is the owner of an entertainment drinking house of "F" of the first floor under the Gangnam-gu Seoul building E, and Defendant A is the person who worked for the foregoing entertainment drinking house from May 2013 to May 2013.
1. At around 10:30 on March 20, 2013, Defendant A testified to the effect that, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (hereinafter “Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.”) to be held in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court 514, Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court at the court of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, the Defendant was present as a witness B on the date of trial of the Defendant’s case (hereinafter “Defendant B and A”), and was notified of the right to refuse to testify, and that, after taking an oath, Defendant “I” was given the said employee G from around September 29, 201 to September 30, 2011, the Defendant did not pay 50,000 won for the rent for the said employee G of the said entertainment drinking house, and that, at that time, KRW 50,000 won was used for the expenses of lodging for sexual traffic (hereinafter “second”).
However, on September 30, 201, G received 50,000 won from B on September 30, 201, and the Defendant told that “I would have dice to H hotel first,” and that I would go to the said hotel. G paid 50,000 won to the said hotel as hotel accommodation expenses, and around 01:50 on the same day, G would receive 200,000 won from B, while G would receive 10,000 won from B and 302 of the said hotel.
Therefore, not the defendant, B put 50,000 won to G as accommodation expenses for sexual traffic (so-called "the second vehicle").
Thus, even though the defendant was a witness who was notified of the right to refuse to testify by the law, he made a false statement contrary to his memory.
2. The Defendant of Defendant B’s perjury 50,00 won in studio used as a waiting room in the said “F” entertainment drinking club between January 1, 2013 and March 20, 2013, the Defendant said that “G” was a taxi.
Any objection shall be asked.