logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.10.17 2018고단4959
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates (ju) D established for the purpose of manufacturing, wholesale, trade, etc. in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant B is a person who operates G for the purpose of the original wholesale, etc. of clothing in building E in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The loan system for corporate purchase fund is a system that alleviates the financial difficulties of the delivery company by reducing the settlement risk of the delivery company due to credit transaction, and where the purchasing company purchases the goods, etc. from the delivery company, the financial institution that received the guarantee from the Credit Guarantee Fund shall immediately pay the purchase price to the delivery company, and the purchasing enterprise is a loan system that redeems

During the process of lending corporate purchase funds, the Defendants, on December 8, 2014, attempted to obtain money from the victim corporate bank for the purpose of financing corporate purchase, by pretending that there was no actual transaction equivalent to KRW 97 million in the transaction amount between the Defendants’ companies on December 8, 2014, even though there was no actual transaction equivalent to KRW 97 million in the transaction amount, by using the fact that the purchasing company and the delivery company only depended on the information entered on the relevant website, whether the actual transaction was made, and the actual use place of the purchase fund was not confirmed.

Defendant

A) On December 8, 2014, at the office of D on December 8, 2014, access to the “www.b.2b.com.com” on the Internet website that provides relevant B2B for the lending of corporate purchase funds and input false information on the fact that, on December 8, 2014, Defendant B had not purchased a total amount of KRW 97 million from G operation of Defendant B, and applied for a loan of corporate purchase funds (hereinafter “instant loan”), and Defendant B also entered false information on the same day that the aforementioned sales was made by accessing the said Internet site through employees on the same day.

arrow