beta
Text
1. The Defendant dated March 30, 2017, as to the Plaintiff’s share of 540/1602 out of 1,789 square meters in 1,000 square meters.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On January 15, 1987, F 2,647 square meters (hereinafter “the land before the instant subdivision”) owns the net G 270/807 shares and H 531/807 shares, respectively, and the ownership transfer registration was completed to E and D with respect to the shares in H’s name on January 15, 1987.
(531/1602 shares). (b)
On February 23, 1994, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with E and D to purchase each of the above shares in KRW 7,400,000 (However, the buyer’s name was the Plaintiff’s husband I who was not the Plaintiff). Since that time, the Plaintiff occupied the farming house in the part of the land of this case and occupied the land of this case.
C. On March 22, 1994, the land prior to the instant partition was divided into C-Do 1,789 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and F-Do 858 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). D. The land prior to the instant partition was divided into KRW 858 square meters (hereinafter “instant land 2”).
The deceased G completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 1, 1994 in accordance with the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992; hereinafter “Special Assistance Act”) concerning E and D shares among the land No. 2 of this case, and as a result, the land No. 2 of this case was owned solely by the deceased G.
E. On September 22, 1995, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer as to E and D’s shares out of the land No. 1 of this case, and the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer as to the net G’s shares out of the land No. 1 of this case due to inheritance due to consultation division on February 22, 2017.
At present, the land of this case is registered in the name of the plaintiff, and 540/1602 shares in the name of the defendant, respectively.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6, witness E's testimony, purport of whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the land of this case was owned by E, D, and net G with respect to the land prior to the subdivision of this case, and that the land of this case was owned by E, D, and that the land of this case was owned by the deceased G. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.