1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court additionally determined as stated in paragraph (2) and applied “ May 37, 2013.” in the second sentence 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance to “ May 27, 2013.” As such, it is identical to the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. Additional determination

A. The Defendants’ assertion 1) with respect to the settlement of the purchase price of the instant land on the 1 and 2- were reduced to 0.75 square meters; ① a site ownership of 12,428,571 square meters on the instant contract (i.e., 174,00,000 square meters ± 14 square meters); ② the amount of 9,321,428 square meters (i.e., 12,428,571 x 0.75 square meters x 0.75 square meters in the previous site ownership; ② at the time of entering into the instant 1-sale contract, the public area of the instant building should be increased to 0.62 square meters in proportion to 0.67 square meters in the area of the instant site; ③ the increase in the area of the building on the 1-sale contract should be recognized to have been increased to 30.38,3766 square meters in the area of the instant site; and (ii) the public area shall be increased to 17019,29660.60.60 square meters in the area.

(b).