logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.06.19 2018가단527737
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,007,960 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from April 27, 2019 to June 19, 2019, and the following.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

On May 2, 2017, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 19,007,960 from the Defendant’s bank account in the name of “D” designated by the Defendant, as the vehicle requires for C’s election campaign, and subsequently, transferred KRW 19,007,960 to the bank account in the name of “D” designated by the Defendant.

On September 2017, the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 1,00,000 from E on September 26, 2017 to the Defendant at the “B Licensed Real Estate Agent” office operated by the Defendant.

On November 3, 2017, the Plaintiff leased KRW 1,000,000 to the Defendant upon the same request from the Defendant.

On November 9, 2017, the Plaintiff received KRW 2,000,000 from the Defendant.

On December 19, 2017, the Plaintiff received a cash custody certificate with the purport that, upon receiving the Defendant’s second request for the lending of deposit money, the Plaintiff lent KRW 20,000,000 to the Defendant, and the Plaintiff returned KRW 20,000,000 from the Defendant until August 30, 2018.

The Plaintiff was paid KRW 38,00,000 to the Defendant on September 20, 2018, by urging the Defendant to repay the loan to the Defendant at the 8th C Si Council.

[Grounds for recognition] According to the facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply), witness E's testimony and the purport of this court's judgment as to the whole of pleadings, the defendant's total amount of loan Nos. 41,007,960 won (=1,000,000 won 1,000,000 won) paid out to the plaintiff from 40,000,000 won (=2,00,000,000 won 38,000,000,000 won) and the remaining loan Nos. 1,07,960 won (including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of this court's judgment as above, it is reasonable for the defendant to have determined the scope of the obligation to submit a copy of the claim to the plaintiff on April 22, 2019 to 207.

arrow