A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 1, 2018, the Defendant called “B” with the victim B, who became aware of through a mobile phone hosting display on a mobile phone, and was traveling a business trip in the astronomical world at present, “B is living in C and making a siren business. B and Dogggggggs, I wish to do so.”

Since that time, the defendant tried to associate with the victim.

1. On July 4, 2018, the Defendant entered into a false statement stating that “The Defendant would pay the credit card price to the Plaintiff first in the Suna basin located in Suwon-dong Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul. The Defendant would pay KRW 50 million and incentives KRW 300 million in nine months, using the credit card in advance and, if the benefits were paid, pay the credit card price to the Plaintiff.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not live in C, did not have any income due to no occupation at the time, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he received credit cards from the victim because there was no particular property.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received the victim’s name D and E from the victim’s position, and in the same way, obtained the F department store card in the victim’s name on July 12, 2018, and on July 20, 2018, received the victim’s name G from July 4, 2018 to November 11, 2018, respectively, and acquired the same amount of pecuniary benefits by settling the amount equivalent to KRW 82,790,606 in total from July 4, 2018 to November 11, 2018 by paying the amount of KRW 592 times in the name of the victim with four credit card in the name of the victim.

2. Around July 7, 2018, the Defendant borrowed money, “I” on the front side of the “I” located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, stating that the Defendant would lend KRW 1 million as “living cost is required.” On September, 201, the Defendant made a false statement that the Defendant would be paid upon the payment of benefits and incentives.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the above even if he borrowed the money from the victim due to the circumstances such as the statement in Paragraph 1.

Ultimately, the Defendant is equal to this.