logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2021.02.09 2020고단4638
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[200 Highest 4638]

1. On July 26, 2020, the Defendant: (a) was driven by a victim B ( South, 66 years old) while under the influence of alcohol in the detailed paper of not more than 5 east-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul on July 26, 202.

C Boarding in a taxi for business purpose.

At around 20:40 on the same day, the Defendant demanded that the damaged person in front of the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central District D continue to drive the taxi for about 10 minutes, such as opening a steering gate while the injured person rejected and demanded that the injured person get off the taxi, and opening a string door in the presence of the string and cutting off the string, and cutting down the string and pushed down the string of the injured person out of the taxi.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's taxi operation by force.

2. On July 26, 2020, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender by a police officer who was dispatched after receiving the report of the above B B B-12 on July 26, 2020; and (b) took custody of the said district police officer; (c) was able to take a bath by large sound; (d) was emitted from the slopeF’s slope of the said district police officer who attempted to restrain the performance of official duties once again; (e) the Defendant emitted the sagn of the slopeF belonging to the said district police officer; and (e) turned the sagn of the sagn of G during the said region; and (e) the Defendant created several paths for other police officers.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers in the course of performing official duties to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in flagrant offenders and the maintenance of order.

[200 Godan 5272] The defendant is arguinging about October 14, 2020 about the front of the H building in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, about 19:54, about the issue of taxi charges.

“Around 112, the Seoul Southern Police Station I police station, who was called out after receiving a 112 report, returned the Defendant who reported 112 on the ground of excessive claims for taxi expenses, sent the Defendant a cab using the Defendant, and sent the cab using the Defendant, and the said J calls for the 53 patrol vehicles boarding the said J, and calls for the said J to disclose his status while keeping him from doing so.

arrow