Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On December 6, 2016, the Defendant driven the above taxi on December 6, 2016, and led two king-distance intersection in Ulsan-gu two king-dong, Ulsan-gu, to go from the Cheong-do to the Roter-ri plane of an industrial tower.

At the time, it is a private-distance intersection where a signal, etc. is installed at night and at least 80 km/h, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed, to live well on the right and the right of the motor vehicle, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through approximately 95.4km/h of the intersection without stopping yellow signal, and was negligent in driving the above intersection from the front side of the Defendant’s front side to the front side of the road of the victim D(23 ) driving the above-mentioned intersection from the upper side of the sloping distance.

As a result, the Defendant suffered damages due to the above occupational negligence by causing approximately 20 weeks of damage to a broad pressure, which is not the left-hand side in need of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. A survey report on actual condition, a response to a request for analysis of traffic accidents (Road Traffic Authority), a report on internal investigation (in the event of an accident, an investigation into the crossing at the time of the accident), and related photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (D);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the types of decisions] shall be limited to the cases where the victim of the first type (any person subject to special sentencing) of traffic accidents has been negligent in causing traffic accidents or expanding damage caused thereby.