1. The defendant

A. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 82,763,445 and KRW 29,00,100 among them, the amount of KRW 82,763,445 shall be from February 18, 2017; and KRW 53,763.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Plaintiff A was in attendance at Fhigh Schools in 2015 and 2016, and the Defendant is a corporation established under Article 15 of the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for Accidents at School (hereinafter “School Safety Act”), which is a school safety mutual aid business entity to which the head of F High School was enrolled.

Plaintiff

B, C is the Plaintiff’s parent, Plaintiff D, and E’s siblings.

B. On August 20, 2015, Plaintiff A was involved in an accident that took place while prone at the time of sports classes, and due to this, Plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as the tear of Madle, Madle, Usle, Usle, Usle, Usle, Usle, etc.

Plaintiff

A was hospitalized in G Hospital on August 25, 2015, and received external treatment from the above hospital’s regular surgery to February 2, 2016, after he/she was hospitalized in G Hospital on August 27, 2015, and received diversative treatment from the above hospital’s external surgery and from the outer half-yearly surgery.

C. On March 9, 2016, Plaintiff A again suffered an accident that occurred while driving a farming tool during the sports class hours.

Plaintiff

A received outpatient treatment on the 10th day of the same month after the day of the next day, and the doctor H of the above hospital who diagnosed the Plaintiff A was diagnosed as knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kak.

Plaintiff

A has undergone a series of outpatients in the G Hospital area after being hospitalized in G Hospital on July 26, 2016 under the medical examination of half-yearly fladrosis and the left-hand slotr, the left-hand slotr, the left-hand slotr, and was hospitalized in G Hospital on July 27, 2016, and re-patientd on July 27, 201.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 8 evidence, Gap 17, 18, 19 evidence (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The accident of this case, which constitutes the plaintiffs' alleged school safety accident, constitutes an obstacle to "a person who has a disability in the function of one section among the three sections of a single bridge" in Article 12 (7) of the Enforcement Decree of the School Safety Act.