1. As to the ruling of this Court 2010 Ghana542812 between the defendant and the network D, this Court 201.

1. In addition to adding paragraph 3 below the facts of recognition, the reasons for the claim are as shown in the annexed Form.

“The Plaintiffs reported the qualified acceptance by the Ulsan District Court 2017Ra5233 on November 8, 2017, and received an adjudication from the said court to accept the report of qualified acceptance on February 22, 2018.” [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiffs did not dispute, each entry in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the number of branches), and the purport of the entire pleadings.”

2. According to the above facts, the scope of the plaintiffs' liability according to the qualified acceptance of the plaintiffs is limited to the scope of the property inherited from the network D, so compulsory execution based on the defendant's succession to the execution clause of this case against the plaintiffs is allowed only to the extent of the property inherited from the network D, and it is reasonable to deny the above part only to the extent of the property exceeding it.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiffs' claim of this case is justified.