1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. According to the reasoning of the claim, Gap evidence Nos. 1-7 and Eul evidence Nos. 1-3 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and Eul's testimony and arguments, the plaintiff is a male of July 194, and the defendant is a living female of birth on February 1, 1957, and the plaintiff and the defendant have living together with the defendant from November 201 to October 201, and have formed a mutual relationship or relationship with each other. The plaintiff did not have the movement voluntarily at the time of living with the defendant. According to the purport of the whole statement of Gap evidence Nos. 1-1 to 7, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 3, and Eul's testimony and arguments, the plaintiff transferred the money to the defendant 1-4,500,000 won to the defendant 2,500,000 won, and there is no difference between the plaintiff's Byung's vehicle and the plaintiff's 1-5,000,000 won,00 won.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that, as the cause of the instant claim, the money transferred by the Plaintiff to the Defendant as above is lent, or, if not, a donation was made on the premise of marriage. Since the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not marry, they failed to fulfill the conditions (this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is understood to have failed to fulfill the condition of suspension), the Defendant is obligated to return the money to the Plaintiff.

However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone was transferred to the Defendant as above.