1. The Defendant’s KRW 52,056,908 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from December 30, 2015 to February 6, 2020.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 30, 2015, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant, who is a sexual surgery, a doctor, a mouting surgery for the cosmetic purpose (a mouting surgery), and a string and strings leading to the upper part of the mouter (a part of the area under the mouter using the router).

B. After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff suffered a 30% range of openings, a pleblance of both sides, and a pleblance of both sides, and a distance from the center side of the entrance to the right side (3 cm on the right side and 2.5 cm on the left side).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the C Hospital Head of this Court, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. 1) The result of the examination of medical records and the result of the examination of body entrusted to the C Hospital Head of this court in charge of the operation, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the Defendant, in light of the overall purport of arguments, the Defendant neglected to perform the operation in this case and caused a scarcity and opening disability to the Plaintiff. (1) The operation in this case is an operation without medical basis; and (2) the operation in this case is an operation without clear basis; and (3) the scarging of the scarg to the inside of the surrounding area is not clearly distinguishable from the surrounding area, and there is no clear judgment on the scargy, and there is no clear judgment on the scargy; and (2) the Plaintiff, prior to the operation in this case, failed to reduce the accurate scargy and constructed a wide range of scarg, thereby causing extensive damage to the surrounding area and causing severe scarging damage to the surrounding area.