A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of B windowatom car.

On November 27, 2012, the Defendant was driving the above vehicle at around 18:45 on November 27, 2012, and was driving the two-lane road in front of the fishermen's meeting, which is located in the luminous death drawings in the city of Gyeong-nam, Yong-Nam, the Defendant was making a left-hand turn while driving the two-lane road in front of the fishermen's meeting, in the direction of Yongsan-ri in the direction of the Gulsan, along about 30

Since there was a three-distance intersection, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately operating and safely driving the steering gear, brakes, etc. of the motor vehicle in the opposite direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the left and got the front part of the DFD car driven by the victim C(56 years of age) who was driving in the opposite opposite lane by negligence, and received the front part of the said car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, including four or more cage cages, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time, even though the Defendant destroyed the above dral car to the extent of scrapping it, and escaped without taking measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident site photographs;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the point of escape after occupational injury), Article 148 and Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of failure to take measures after causing damage and damage) concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The fact that the accused has agreed with the victim under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation, and there is no criminal record for which the accused has been punished heavier than a fine.