logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.06.15 2015고합100
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강간등치상)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five years and for three years and six months, respectively.

The defendants are every 200 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On April 9, 2013, A was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for night-time intrusion theft, etc. in the main branch of the Chuncheon District Court on April 9, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence in the original prison on January 4, 2014.

Defendant

A and Defendant B are the same as high school, and they are friendly-gu.

Defendant

A, on May 30, 2015, he/she became aware of the victim E (V, 15 years of age) through a telephone in the middle of 2015, on May 30, 2015, Defendant B, on June 12:18, 2015, with a single sexual relationship with the victim, with Defendant B on June 12:18, 201.

Around 18:00 on the same day, Defendant B made the Defendant 210 as G 210 in the original city F where the Defendant and the victim had sexual intercourse with the Defendant.

Defendant

When A and the victim are sexual intercourse around 18:00 of June 6, 2015 in the above G 210, Defendant B demanded the victim to enter the sexual flag and as soon as possible, Defendant B demanded the victim to enter the sexual organ. Although the victim was able to see and refuse to do so, Defendant B did not refuse to enter the victim's sexual organ in order for the victim to become sound and the victim was able to see.

Although the defendants refuse to accept the body without the body, the defendant B had a sexual intercourse once with the victim, and the defendant A had a sexual organ into the victim's entrance.

Defendant B continued to have the victim come up on the body of Defendant B, and had the victim sexual intercourse once, and Defendant A had the victim sexual intercourse once in the above manner, and Defendant B had the victim sexual intercourse once with the victim, and Defendant B had the victim’s sexual intercourse with the victim as soon as possible.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to have sexual intercourse with the juvenile victim by force, and during that process, the victims suffered from the diversity impairment and the diversity impairment of the two-day therapy.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first public trial protocol

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A statement of opinions on psychological evaluation;

1. H. H.

arrow