The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (4 million won in punishment, and 40 hours in sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the following: (a) the judgment was examined; (b) the Defendant made confession, confession, and reflect; (c) the victim does not want punishment under the agreement with the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant is a beneficiary of livelihood benefits; or (e) the Defendant repeatedly commits an indecent act against the victim

In addition, considering the fact that there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.