logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.06.24 2015노1350
협박
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Around November 7, 2013, the summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant had a her husband-D relationship with the victim E (here, 44 years of age). The Defendant requested the victim to meet with the victim after hearing the horses claiming that the victim was rape, but the victim refused to meet with the victim. On December 13, 2013, the Defendant filed a complaint on the following grounds: (a) the victim was raped several times from D to the National Police Agency of Chungcheongbuk-do; and (b) the victim was habitually threatened.

Since May 13, 2014, D was prosecuted for rape, etc. with the Cheongju District Court. However, on January 23, 2015, D was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual intimidation) and not guilty for rape, and is currently under trial at the appellate court.

Here, “former” is clear that the context before and after the instant public prosecution was instituted on May 29, 2015.

Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion that the judgment of the appellate court of the instant case rendered on November 12, 2015, after the judgment of the appellate court was rendered ( July 16, 2015) is nothing more than a misunderstanding of the facts charged or the judgment of the lower court that determined that the instant case of rape, etc. was still in a trial of the appellate court.

At around 16:54 on November 27, 2013, the Defendant sent the victim’s mobile phone text message “I stop in order to maintain her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her home,” and, around 15:07 on December 9, 2013, the Defendant wanted to retire 15 years from the governance, so I would like to do so and would make it clear that I would commit any act before her consciousness and work. I sent the Defendant a text message “I send the last warning to her husband. I will at any time at around 18:26 on the same day.”

I would like to see how we can see how we can see in the house.

Until 9 days today, the family shall be the same if there is no obstacle to the answer.

arrow