logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.12.18 2014구합1677
불법건축이행강제금부과처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the building B, C, and the second floor above the ground (hereinafter “instant building”) in Yangsan-si, and is operating the instant building as a pen.

B. On August 8, 2013, the Defendant discovered, as a result of the instant building’s on-site investigation, that the Plaintiff was using the instant building without permission, such as the partitions of “division 1”, “illegal building status”, and “non-building status” as indicated in the partitions in Appendix 1-4, attached Table 1, and ordered the Plaintiff to voluntarily correct the instant building on August 12, 2013 and October 7, 2013.

(1) Part 1: (1) Part 1:

C. The Defendant did not comply with the above corrective order by November 8, 2013, which is the final correction deadline, and on November 13, 2013, issued a notice to the Plaintiff on the promotion of correction of buildings and the imposition and collection of charges for compelling compliance. On January 3, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition imposing a total of KRW 29,846,00 in the column “division” in the said Table against the Plaintiff on January 3, 2014.

On February 2014, the Plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal with the administrative appeals commission of Gyeong-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and on March 26, 2014, the administrative appeals commission of Gyeong-do is the administrative appeals commission of Gyeong-do.

arrow