1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, to the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A: (a) KRW 93,608,249 and KRW 53,808.

1. In order to extend the prescription period of the claim for the claim that the Plaintiff received from the Korea Technology Finance Corporation (Seoul Central District Court 2007Kadan23969 decided on September 23, 2015: 201, the Plaintiff claimed the payment of the claim pursuant to the previous judgment against the Defendant A, who was the Defendant of the preceding judgment, died, the Defendant A, who was the heir of the network, was reported on January 14, 2019, and C, on November 13, 2018, and thus the report was accepted, the Plaintiff sought payment of the claim pursuant to the previous judgment against the Defendant A and C within the scope of the property inherited from the networkD).2.

(a) Defendant B: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

B. Defendant A and C: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act, and Article 150(3) of the same Act, Defendant A and C submitted the reply and preparatory documents containing the defenses of the qualified acceptance, but do not dispute the Plaintiff’s claim on the premise that the qualified acceptance was granted)