1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases: “Each video of evidence Nos. 19 and 20, and the result of the party himself examination of the plaintiff A,” “after the first entry of the fifth part below, the testimony of the witness F of the court of first instance is added,” and “the discovery of the defendant vehicle” of the fourth 13th th th th 13th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th,” and this is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of

2. The Plaintiffs asserts that, even in the case of the instant accident, even if the Plaintiff’s vehicle was injured by the central line at the time of the instant accident, if the Defendant’s vehicle was to sufficiently reduce the speed and to the right side of the proceeding, the instant accident did not occur, and thus, the Defendant’s vehicle is also negligent.

In light of the following circumstances, the first instance judgment, cited earlier, revealed that the testimony of Gap evidence Nos. 19 and 20 of the evidence Nos. 19 and 20 of the trial witness F, namely, ① the driver of the defendant vehicle had already been driven along the center line at the first time of the discovery of the plaintiff vehicle, and even if the plaintiff's vehicle was exposed to the speed of the speed of the vehicle at the time of the first detection of the vehicle, the driver of the defendant vehicle had been exposed to the right side immediately before the accident. ② The location of the accident in this case is the straight line, but the restaurant that the plaintiff's vehicle started to walk after the U.S., seems to have been difficult to find the plaintiff vehicle in advance. ③ Even if the plaintiff's vehicle and the defendant's vehicle are driving across the direction of the vehicle, the accident in this case occurred, and even if the plaintiff's vehicle was discovered, it was found that the vehicle was driven at a speed and that the vehicle was driven at a speed.